Stick with whatever's called on the field, not enough evidence to overturn, I don't hate it. Maybe a check on the monitor wouldn't have been a bad idea?
It really is unfortunate the call didn't go their way, and it presumably cost them 2 points.
But it's up to the Revs, to now make sure those 2 points "lost" don't make a difference. Every team faces officiating adversity, great teams overcome it.
Stick with whatever's called on the field, not enough evidence to overturn, I don't hate it. Maybe a check on the monitor wouldn't have been a bad idea?
Thanks for getting to the bottom of this.
It really is unfortunate the call didn't go their way, and it presumably cost them 2 points.
But it's up to the Revs, to now make sure those 2 points "lost" don't make a difference. Every team faces officiating adversity, great teams overcome it.
Yea, not enough evidence to overturn but "the preferred outcome would have been for the on-field officials to award the goal."
So then … they *don't* think the call was wrong
Or, Geiger as an individual does, but the org thinks "maintain the initial call" is correct.
And this means VAR didn't come into play, right? VAR confirmed the original call?
Yeah it seems like call on the field was offside and that call was confirmed (or not enough evidence to overturn)