4 Comments
User's avatar
Paul's avatar

I don't think the Revs missed Feingold that much - Bye did a very good job as his replacement. Injuries are part of the game and I'm tiring of the Revs using them as an excuse for every poor showing. This road loss underscores the need for them to earn points at home, which they have not been able to do lately and they'll have thei work cut out for them on Wednesday.

Expand full comment
Seth Macomber's avatar

I thought Bye had a fine game. He had a couple of good crosses and slipped Gil nicely on that play that didn’t connect. I just think Feingold offers something different, especially on the attacking end.

Wednesday presents a big opportunity for the Revs. Big game in front of a big crowd.

Expand full comment
Roberta's avatar

I agree , 100%!

Expand full comment
Dave Capone's avatar

“We recognized it, we made an adjustment to drop an extra guy back, but in that play we rush out and we conceded the goal because of us not being good in that transition moment off of our attacking corner.”

Interesting. I'd argue that throwing everyone back during the transition and no one putting pressure on the ball, giving David Da Costa about 5 miles of open grass in every direction around him was what went wrong. But based on this it seems like that was exactly what Porter wanted

Expand full comment